WIP - 5"-32 dual mounts

Discussion in 'Digital Design and Fabrication' started by NickMyers, Jun 18, 2016.

Page 1 of 2
  1. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    @Maxspin asked me to whip up something to replace the bits people keep shooting off his Washington
    Its not 100% true to life, but I think it'll do well enough
    5-32-i6.PNG
    5-32-i7.PNG
     
    NickMyers, Jun 18, 2016
    #1
    Tugboat, Maxspin, WillCover and 3 others like this.
  2. rcaircraftnut

    rcaircraftnut Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    1,520
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Looks nice. Good job.
     
    rcaircraftnut, Jun 18, 2016
    #2
    NickMyers likes this.
  3. dietzer

    dietzer Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    739
    Very nice!
     
    dietzer, Jun 19, 2016
    #3
    NickMyers likes this.
  4. Xanthar

    Xanthar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2015
    Posts:
    670
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Nice! I'm curious, what CAD program did you use to draw this?
     
    Xanthar, Jun 19, 2016
    #4
    NickMyers likes this.
  5. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Autodesk Inventor
     
    NickMyers, Jun 19, 2016
    #5
  6. Beaver

    Beaver 2020 Rookie of the Year Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2013
    Posts:
    3,739
    Location:
    Central PA
    Man, Nick, that looks great! Your CAD skills far exceed my own. You going to add this to the Resource section, right? I want one. ;)
     
    Beaver, Jun 19, 2016
    #6
  7. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    test run turned out ok, few areas to work on
    my retraction settings are causing me some problems on the captains hood,
    and i forgot to enable supports so the sight hoods have some minor deformations on the bottom.
    I think I'll push the backside features out a little further to gain a little more definition on them.
    20160620_130048.jpg 20160620_124900.jpg 20160620_130106.jpg
     
    NickMyers, Jun 20, 2016
    #7
    Panzer, Xanthar, Maxspin and 1 other person like this.
  8. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Thanks but, don't sell yourself short, burn a little time in your CAD program of choice and you'll soon be making all kinds of stuff.
    probably will once I'm reasonably happy with the model and its printability.
    What are you building that needs one?
     
    NickMyers, Jun 20, 2016
    #8
  9. Beaver

    Beaver 2020 Rookie of the Year Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2013
    Posts:
    3,739
    Location:
    Central PA
    Heh, well my CAD program of choice right now is the free version of Sketchup. Which, while being easy to learn and use, is pretty much limited to simple models. I've been looking around for a better CAD program to use. I've downloaded FreeCAD and I'm slowly learning how to use it.
    That's just it, I don't 'need' one. :) But it's so pretty I 'want' one. ;)
     
    Beaver, Jun 20, 2016
    #9
  10. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Fusion 360 should still be free for hobbyists and small-timers and gets you a more robust tool chain. And as a student (you moonlight as one somewhere, right?) you should qualify for an educational license for Inventor

    Build a Sumner or Gearing class DD
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2016
    NickMyers, Jun 20, 2016
    #10
  11. Hovey

    Hovey Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Posts:
    323
    Location:
    Washington
    Very nice work Nick. I might have to print me up a set.
     
    Hovey, Jun 20, 2016
    #11
    NickMyers likes this.
  12. Beaver

    Beaver 2020 Rookie of the Year Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2013
    Posts:
    3,739
    Location:
    Central PA
    Downloaded Fusion 360 today. It's been pretty easy learning. After a few hours of doing tutorials, I was able to design a piece I needed that I couldn't do on Sketchup. :)
     
    Beaver, Jun 21, 2016
    #12
    NickMyers likes this.
  13. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    The rights tools for a job
     
    NickMyers, Jun 21, 2016
    #13
    Beaver likes this.
  14. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,366
    Fusion360 is in all respects a proper commercial grade parametric 3D CAD program, I think you can do direct modeling with it too but stick to parametric for design work. I'm not a huge fan of all my files being stored on the cloud but for the functionality it is hard to beat especially for the price, and the cloud does allow for some neat collaboration opportunities. I was really leary moving away from Pro/E since a lot of free CAD packages aren't so great but they did a good job with Fusion360. The tool chain to get g-code is really simple, I haven't run into any real issues with it for running the mill, I imagine it is just as easy for a 3D printer. If you're a hobbyist looking for CAD software I can't recommend it enough.
     
    SnipeHunter, Jun 21, 2016
    #14
    GregMcFadden and Beaver like this.
  15. GregMcFadden

    GregMcFadden Facilitator RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Posts:
    2,567
    +1 to Snipehunter's note. I use proe/creo, inventor, solid works and others at work and for the cost fusion is the way for a hobbiest to go (or even small business for that matter)
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2016
    GregMcFadden, Jun 22, 2016
    #15
  16. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    I've got a dozen, all blems in some manner or another - mostly down to print settings though, pretty content with the model itself. I should probably stop printing them at this point, as I don't actually have a ship these would be used for. @Maxspin's lucky day!

    Was going to install some barrels but seem to be out of 1/16" stock. So these are just acetone wiped and then shot with a quick few passes of the rattlecan primer with little to no cleanup on the parts done first.

    20160630_004251-COLLAGE.jpg
     
    NickMyers, Jun 30, 2016
    #16
    Beaver, Lou, dietzer and 1 other person like this.
  17. dietzer

    dietzer Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    739
    Very nice!

    Would love to have some of these in 1/96 scale sometime...
     
    dietzer, Jun 30, 2016
    #17
  18. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,411
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    us-5-38-96scale.PNG
    probably would print pretty well. Building for battlestations?
     
    NickMyers, Jun 30, 2016
    #18
  19. dietzer

    dietzer Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    739
    Eventually. I have one of RCENGR's 1/96 Baltimore hulls on the back burner.
     
    dietzer, Jun 30, 2016
    #19
  20. rcaircraftnut

    rcaircraftnut Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    1,520
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Move it to the front burner, crank it to full, then rip the knob off!
     
    rcaircraftnut, Jun 30, 2016
    #20
Page 1 of 2