Would this ship even be legal?

Discussion in 'Ship Comparison' started by wfirebaugh, Nov 29, 2025.

  1. wfirebaugh

    wfirebaugh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2013
    Posts:
    526
    Location:
    El Paso Texas, USA
    USS Arkansas built 1899-1903, would this ship even be leagal? This ship looks like a cheat not a OP cheat but effectively with almost no way to shoot out the sides unless the opposing ship gets in close...

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Nomercy

    Nomercy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2021
    Posts:
    232
    Location:
    Maryland
    Not for fastgun
     
  3. wfirebaugh

    wfirebaugh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2013
    Posts:
    526
    Location:
    El Paso Texas, USA
    Is it the year the keel was layed? Or just the fact that is is considered a one of the last monitor type ships? I really cant imagine this ship being see worthy other then coastal or river usage.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2025
  4. Kotori87

    Kotori87 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Posts:
    3,560
    I could not see those particular ships ever being built in Big Gun *or* Fast Gun. Leaving aside the issue of construction dates, It's just too small to effectively fit all the necessary gear. In scale, this thing is 21 inches long with a maximum draft of 1 inch. In order to build it, you would likely need to add extra depth to gain the space and displacement necessary. You could get similar performance from later WWI-era monitors like Erebus, Roberts, etc. without needing to add depth or otherwise compromise the design.
    I absolutely adore the style of early-period ships. But I also appreciate a ship that is practical to build and maintain, which is why I focus more on large predreadnoughts. You can get the same aesthetics and maneuverability, while getting a much more practical and maintainable platform.