3D Printed Roma: Negative Pressure Canister Cannon Tested at Maker Faire

Discussion in 'Digital Design and Fabrication' started by Rob Wood, May 22, 2015.

  1. dietzer

    dietzer Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    739
    Thanks for taking one for the team, Tug! :)

    Jeff,, man thanks for sharing the files. I agree with Rob in that this could revolutionize the hobby for those that use big gun style cannons, including the 1/96 Battlestations format.

    Ignoring the cost of the printer, could you estimate the cost of your cannon, both with and without rotation?

    Also, what kind of printer did you use? I'm considering investing in one, and am open to suggestions for 3D printing newbie.

    Thanks!
     
  2. BigGunJeff

    BigGunJeff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Posts:
    248
    It's not expensive materials wise. There's probably around $30 in printing filament, $15 in aluminum, a $16 QEV, etc. Call it $75 all in.

    I use a Flashforge Creator Pro printer, which is a makerbot V2 clone. It is a great printer, and can be bought on Amazon for around $1200. I also hear good things about the printrbot metal simple, which can be had for around half that cost.
     
  3. Rob Wood

    Rob Wood NAMBA Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Posts:
    257
    Location:
    Daly City, CA
    Here's why I've been pushing this technology for Big Gun: The last time I bought a Big Gun cannon, it was $275. I bought three ($825), and I had to wait 4 months to get them. You can buy a perfectly decent 3D printer for that amount of money, and then for $75 each, make your own cannons. Your own superstructures and "cosmetic" pieces, such as lifeboats, searchlights, radar units, direction finders, etc., too. The day is coming when 3D printers will be as ubiquitous as inkjet printers, and that means that competition will drive the quality of the printed objects up, and drive the cost of printers, parts and materials down.

    If I'm right about all of this, our ships - regardless of scale or format - will look better and better, as replacing shot-up or shot-off cosmetic parts becomes trivial - while at the same time, an increasing number of enthusiasts will take up the hobby. When that happens, numbers will improve for vendors such as Strike Models who supply parts and materials that can't be printed by an ordinary home-level printer, if at all.

    Jeff's design leads logically to development of rotating cannons in ever decreasing sizes. Wouldn't it be a kick to see something like an Atlanta-class cruiser with all twins rotating and functional?

    I know there are valid concerns about this technology, even beyond the dependability and safety issues, but I figure if enough of us, like Tugboat, are willing to take a few rounds to the nuts in pursuit of excellence, we're going to see some amazing inventions in the near future that will rock our world.

    What really has me excited is that the tricky and labor-intensive requirements for producing detailed superstructure parts and cannon are being challenged by this technology, and easy and cost-effective manufacturing is being handed back to the individual captains. It's how this hobby began, after all, and what makes it so enjoyable for those of us who have the skills, machine tools and workshops to make it happen. Imagine the possibilities or fabricating virtually anything you need, right on your desk in your home, while you sleep.

    Rob
     
  4. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    Mark Jenks and I have been posting our files here on the forums for the betterment of the hobby... want a pump? Print one! Want an Evstafi turret? Print one! We definitely believe that 3D printing will help advance the hobby. Printers in the future will be much more capable than these, colors selected on the fly, etc. The materials available for printing are rapidly expanding, too.
     
    Rob Wood likes this.
  5. HTMills

    HTMills Awesome Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Posts:
    103
    Location:
    Justin Texas
    Love it might I suggest using NijaFlex filament for turrets and supper structure. I haven't tried it myself but the concept of being " bluetproof " catches my eye
     
  6. jch72

    jch72 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Posts:
    449
    Location:
    Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
    Nice. Ninjaflex is a flexible polyurethane. Print a drive belt and quiet the noisy gears!
    Website
     
  7. ish311

    ish311 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Posts:
    527
    Location:
    North Central Florida
    don't recommend printing a belt. just buy a precast one.
     
  8. jch72

    jch72 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Posts:
    449
    Location:
    Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
    I recommended you print a belt, I wouldn't.
     
  9. irnuke

    irnuke -->> C T D <<--

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Posts:
    1,079
    Location:
    York, SC
    Jeff, not to worry. Take a look at these pics:

    [​IMG]

    And Bismark:

    [​IMG]

    See the rough paint / armor surface? Your print job simulates it perfectly.
     
  10. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,409
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Have these continue to hold up for you through the year? Any unanticipated parts getting replaced, etc?
     
  11. bmarkb

    bmarkb Active Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Posts:
    162
    Location:
    Hampton, VA
    Does the negative pressure cannon require a different CO2 system than the "standard" system that supports Indiana cannon?
     
  12. BigGunJeff

    BigGunJeff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Posts:
    248
    The cannons have held up well since most of the "loaded" parts are aluminum or brass. The 3-d printed parts are just the magazine, which doesn't see to much force. The superstructure is still in fine shape even though it has been shot at frequently by one of our captains running an Iowa that has strong guns. A couple of the secondaries have some embedded ammo, but otherwise she has held up much better that a balsa or foam superstructure.
     
  13. Kotori87

    Kotori87 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Posts:
    3,536
    bmark brings up a good point. Normal negative-pressure cannons require a different plumbing system in order to safe your cannons without accidentally firing them. This requires a bleed line and a couple of check valves for each cannon. I didn't see provision for that in your cannons. How does your safety switch disarm your cannons?
     
  14. HTMills

    HTMills Awesome Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2015
    Posts:
    103
    Location:
    Justin Texas
    Very nice looking boat love it and I am looking forward to the big Reaville
     
  15. Captain obvious

    Captain obvious Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2016
    Posts:
    215
    Location:
    Hastings, MI
    Can these be done by someone with very little cad experience? Also, are these something you would produce for sale?
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2016
  16. Pilot3759

    Pilot3759 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    Howdy. I have a fair amount of 3d printing experience, as well as printing with some alternate materials and nylon mixes. Has anyone considered making the pressure parts, such as the barrel out of these materials? They are harder to print, generally require a special bed, and a heated chamber... but they are much stronger than ABS, I don't believe there would be any problems with a properly designed and printed nylon barrel, but wanted to find out if anyone has tried them.
     
  17. Rob Wood

    Rob Wood NAMBA Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Posts:
    257
    Location:
    Daly City, CA
    We've shied away from printing critical pieces that must take a beating. It's certainly possible to print something like a barrel, with the bend already in it, but it would take a huge amount of testing before I would consider it ready for combat. It's hard to beat stainless steel.
     
  18. Pilot3759

    Pilot3759 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Posts:
    12
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I understand your concerns, but remember, they used to say the same thing about aluminum and airplanes! While I wouldn't be comfortable making a 3d printed pressure vessel to hold the full 880psi unregulated pressure of CO2 from the bottle (although I bet I could), the full 145+-5 psi put out in full by the regulator should be easily handled. Many are already using plastic tubing to go from the magazine to the stainless. At these pressures and with the thinness of the stainless you are using, it's not hard to beat stainless steel in cost or pressure with a composite or a nylon. The barrel can even have a more authentic look, thicker at the breach and thinner at the muzzle. I have built an abs pressure vessel that held way more pressure than I will admit for testing, and Nylon is better in every way, except for cost and ease of use. You can even print a real rifled gun barrel that is good for multiple shots. As I am told Kittens get sad if no pic is included:

    IMG_2107.JPG
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2016
  19. BigGunJeff

    BigGunJeff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Posts:
    248
    In my experience 3-D printing is most useful when it is used to make the "bulk" of the thing you're making and using conventional parts where precision or strength are needed. I will always use a stainless steel bearing for rotation over something 3-D printed for example. Same with pressure vessels and barrels. It's easier to braze some copper or aluminum parts together than try to engineer strength into something 3-D printed... At least with today's home level printers.

    Having said that, some key patents are expiring that may make metal printers more affordable and accessible. I wouldn't be surprised to see within the next five years and explosion in 3-d printed metal parts. I recently designed a metal canister style negative pressure gun and had it quoted at Shapeways. They have a nice metal printing process where they print in stainless steel powder and then infuse with bronze to make it 100% solid. It was too expensive, however and the gun would have been around $500 for one using that process. Hopefully the cost drops quickly as is typical with most new technologies.
     
  20. GregMcFadden

    GregMcFadden Facilitator RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Posts:
    2,536
    you may also want to check out protolabs. it has been my experience at least with plastic parts that at anything more than one off, protolabs usually has vastly superior 3dp pricing than shapeways (although last time I checked was 6mo ago ).