Big Guns Torpedo Boat designs for a first build

Discussion in 'Ship Comparison' started by daemond6, Sep 19, 2011.

  1. daemond6

    daemond6 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Posts:
    99
    Hey, I'm still thinking between a Brogue CVE (Kit from rcengr ) or a Torpedo Boat for my first ship, and was just wandering if anyone had built a torpedo boat, and what they think of it, in regards to build enjoyability and effectiveness, and where they found plans from.

    I was thinking of just buying a 1/96th scale kit and using that as a basis, but I'm not sure.

    Any comments would be greatly appreciated.

    Dave.
     
  2. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    Go with the CVE. Small is very hard to do unless you are very skilled at building.
     
  3. mike5334

    mike5334 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,877
    Location:
    Mississippi
    To give an idea of how small a torpedo boat is ...

    The PT series was 80' long with a 20' beam. In 1/144th scale, that equals 6.7" long by 1.7" wide. In 1/96th scale it would be 10" long by 2.5" wide.

    A very difficult build even for very expirienced builders.
     
  4. daemond6

    daemond6 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Posts:
    99
    Hmm, ok.
    Is there a better choice then, for a tt armed boat in 1/96? Maybe an ff or similar size? Was thinking of something small and fast, but with tt's for most of its hitting power (would save a lot of money/trouble compared to buying/building a cannon system with the uncertainties I'm having around the legality of a big guns cannon systems.
     
  5. buttsakauf

    buttsakauf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2010
    Posts:
    695
    Location:
    Waycross, GA
    There are tons of great destroyers and light cruisers that would be under 5feet long in 1/96 scale. Many have 6, 8,9,or 10 torpedo tubes. Pich your favorite Nation or most handsome class. Whatever your favorite is! I think the Royal Navy's Battle class destroyers are very nice. Good speed, good size, and sharp looking! And a sweet name to boot! Both battlersconnection.com and strikemodels.com have 1/144 scale fiberglass hulls for smaller ships. Destroyers, light cruisers etc... There are several scale modelling sites that carry 1/96 scale fiberglass hulls as well. I just dont know them.
    Mike Butts
     
  6. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    I would agree with Mike. The battle class is a great looking class of ships. Should be easy to do in 1/96. For a more Great War flair, you could go with HMS Swift. Her drawback is a very light torpedo armament.
     
  7. buttsakauf

    buttsakauf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2010
    Posts:
    695
    Location:
    Waycross, GA
    Free plans to a Tribal class with which you could make a reasonably accurate hull. It does have a few hull sections. http://www.hnsa.org/doc/plans/tribal.pdf However I say pursue whatever class really gets your motor goin.
    Mike Butts
     
  8. daemond6

    daemond6 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Posts:
    99
    Thanks Mike, ill Download them in the morningon my laptop
     
  9. daemond6

    daemond6 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Posts:
    99
    After finally getting round to looking at the Wikipedia entry for battle class destroyers, I'm not sure which are legal for Big Gun rules (although I'm still not sure which ruleset I was going to adopt, apart from 1/96th scale) with regards to dates laid down, and completed...

    So I guess I'm asking which rules use 1/96 scale and which type of Battle class destroyers would be legal in them. (1942, 1943, or 1944)

    Any help would be great, thanks.
     
  10. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    Depends on when they were launched, generally the class is okay.
     
  11. eighthgear

    eighthgear Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Posts:
    85
    What exactly comes with this kit?
     
  12. rcengr

    rcengr Vendor

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Posts:
    1,291
    Location:
    Ohio
    The Bogue CVE kit comes with the 1/4" plywood parts to make a 1:144 hull and 1/8" lite ply for the hanger deck and tower. To complete the hull you will need 1/32 plywood for sheeting, 1/8"x1/4" stringers, and balsa to fill in the bow and stern. And add all the internals to outfit it. Below is what you basically get, without the stringer and with a wood instead of a foam tower.[​IMG]
    I'm not sure what kind of armament a Bogue gets in Big Gun, it only gets one gun for Treaty. Disadvantages of the Bogue: it's slow, turns slow, and is lightly armed. Advantages of the Bogue: Lots of room and weight to work with, making it easy for the beginner to build. I take my Bogue to displays, and there is so much interior room that I usually put all my parts, tools, and extras inside so I only have to make one trip!
     
  13. Knight4hire

    Knight4hire Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Posts:
    963
    Ah!!! A PT Boat!!! That was my first dream boat to build. My club loaned me a Mogador to finish (One of the largest destroyers ever built) to teach me a lesson about small ships. It was a bit stressful to get her operational as an unarmed ship. I was also laoned a liberty ship with I armed. That was a bit stressful as well, but I was successful. The MOG is now drydocked as I build DKM Tirpitz and sail the liberty.

    Difficult first build has cause folks to leave the hobby. That is the last thing we would want. That is why BIG GUNNERS have an unwritten rule. For your first build, build something BIG. Then as your building skills improve go smaller.
    A LARGE build is very forgiving, and is easier and cheaper that something small.

    As for a PT boat, yes a 144 scale boat has been built. If you search the web, I sure that you will find it. It is unarmed!
    For building an armed PT boat, Well one day I am sure that it will happen, but it will be very high tech and very expensive.

    For cost effectiveness, look at the French BB's, they have fewer turrets thus cutting cost.
     
  14. DarrenScott

    DarrenScott -->> C T D <<--

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Posts:
    1,077
    Location:
    Australia
    There has been an armed PT boat built. It was constructed by "Gadget" Gage here in Australia.
    Whenever it's single spring propelled torp was fired, Newton's first law took charge and the boat flipped over backwards.
    I've never seen it personally, but it's a legend here in the AusBG.
     
  15. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    Actually I think that is Newton's Second Law.
     
  16. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,359
    keep guessing....not that many choices left...
     
  17. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    #2 is F=MA isn't it? It's only been 30 years since High school physics. :)
     
  18. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,359
    yes, #2 is F=MA which of course is in effect (as it always is!, however to be fair if we're going to count that then law #1 is working too...) but the action/reaction bit is law #3, which is what was described. Action = firing the torp, reaction = boat flipping over backwards.
     
  19. NATIVE79

    NATIVE79 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Posts:
    9
    I thinking of building a PT-109 for my first one. What do yal think would be a good starter ship?
     
  20. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,405
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Pt is too small, much too small. Go heavy cruiser or larger.