How thick are your rudders?

Discussion in 'Construction' started by NickMyers, May 26, 2016.

?

How thick are your rudders?

  1. 0 - 0.249" ( Less than 1/4" )

    31.3%
  2. 0.250" - 0.3749" ( Less than 3/8" )

    25.0%
  3. 0.375" - 0.499" ( Less than 1/2" )

    37.5%
  4. 0.500" -0.6249" ( Less than 5/8" )

    25.0%
  5. 0.625" + ( greater than 5/8" )

    12.5%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,405
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Inspired by real life yet again!
    How thick are your rudders at their thickest points?

    Multiple selections allowed because many of you have multiple ships.
     
  2. Lou

    Lou It's just toy boats -->> C T D <<-- Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Posts:
    2,092
    Location:
    Smyrna, Georgia
    About so.
    [​IMG]
     
    rcaircraftnut and NickMyers like this.
  3. WillCover

    WillCover -->> C T D <<--

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Posts:
    658
    Location:
    Harrison, Michigan
    Soooo many places to go with this...i abstain.:rolleyes:
     
  4. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,405
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Thats not what you said the other night
     
  5. Charley

    Charley Vendor

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2015
    Posts:
    214
    Location:
    Lancing, Tennessee
    My Vans have ~ 5/8"+ , NC~1/2" smaller ships would most likely be thinner
     
  6. Maxspin

    Maxspin -->> C T D <<--

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Posts:
    634
    Location:
    Yelm, Washington
    Hmmmmm..... I may have voted incorrectly.....

    My rudders are made from (3) 1/8 pieces of plywood. I then came back and retrofitted a 3/8 fishtail to the outside of each rudder. So now straight on they would be 9/16" or over 1/2" wide. They don't seem that wide.....
     
  7. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,359
    A 1/2" wide rudder on a destroyer doesn't have the same effect as a 1/2" wide rudder on a large battleship.


    Also for @Maxspin, if you limit individual rudder width to say, 1/2", single rudder ships lose even more.
     
  8. Maxspin

    Maxspin -->> C T D <<--

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Posts:
    634
    Location:
    Yelm, Washington
    More what????

    I voted that my rudders were less than 1/2". Yes I could make them fit into a 1/2" envelope, so technically I am correct. However that is not how they are run. They have over 1/2" of drag the way they are attached.
     
  9. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,359
    Performance relative to dual rudder ships. Kick them while they're down!
     
  10. Lou

    Lou It's just toy boats -->> C T D <<-- Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Posts:
    2,092
    Location:
    Smyrna, Georgia
    Rudders are this year's "fear fest". Please correct me if I am wrong, but I see this stemming from the Vanguards and the effectiveness of a single rudder ship having a performance that was not seen before in the hobby. High torque motors with a huge leading edge and fish-tails to help in turning. So now we are going to outlaw modifications to rudders and make them for the most part flat. What this does is kill any performance gain for a single rudder ship (I run a QE, so no bias on my part).
    Would the membership of fast gun get behind a rule proposal that would also make the total square inches the same between dual rudder and single rudder? Meaning, no overage for dual rudder ships.
    Keep in mind we can be real $%#$%'s and show up with a bismarck to fight on the side of the allies, there is no rule saying one side needs to fight for a particular side.
     
  11. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,405
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    I wasnt planning to drag that whole discussion here, was more interested in the distribution of rudder thicknesses, but if you guys want to discuss that can of worms, go for it.
     
  12. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,359
    @NickMyers - My original point was that rudder thickness doesn't mean much by itself. It should be taken in relation to the rest of the system. The distribution of rudder thickness on say class 6 ships might be more interesting/meaningful than just across the hobby as a whole. Or even rudder thickness vs prop diameter.
     
  13. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,405
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    A fair point
     
  14. rcengr

    rcengr Vendor

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Posts:
    1,291
    Location:
    Ohio
    Exactly why wing thicknesses are measured as a percent of the chord.
     
  15. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,359
    Shocking, right. Kinda like this is fluid dynamics or something.