MWC NATS

Discussion in 'General' started by Gettysburg114th, Jul 17, 2008.

  1. Bob

    Bob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Posts:
    1,318
    portpolarbear.com will have some as soon as I finish updating the page.
     
  2. Gettysburg114th

    Gettysburg114th Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Posts:
    1,682
    Thanks Bob. Hope everyone had a good time.
     
  3. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
    Bob
    We haven't slept in days awaiting word.
    And photos. Haha.
    Thanks.
    Mikey
     
  4. wrenow

    wrenow RIP

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Posts:
    439
    Thanks for the updates. Sounds like a grand time was had by all. I am sure 50 ships on the water was an awsome sight to behold. Wish I could have been there.

    What is it with Axis this year? With two rookie captains and one new, untried, Lutzow built the week of the event, Axis creamed the Allies (all veterans with veteran ships)for the first time at NABGO (weekend before last, July 10-13), too, in BOTH of the major scenario events. First time in the history of NABGO. Go Figure.

    Still working on the battle reports.

    Cheers,
     
  5. djranier

    djranier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Posts:
    1,756
    Bob posted the pictures on the PPB site, here is the link.

    Visit this site

    In shot 2654 you can see the big bad bully NC's trying their best to sink my Kumano, but they failed.
     
  6. Gettysburg114th

    Gettysburg114th Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Posts:
    1,682
    Thanks Dave, thanks Bob.
     
  7. Gettysburg114th

    Gettysburg114th Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Posts:
    1,682
    That Fuso of Jeff's must have pounded people when they tried to come pat the stern to overtake it.
     
  8. Bob

    Bob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Posts:
    1,318
    You don't chase Jeff. Or play stern to stern with him. You keep your distance and make him chase you. A long range sidemount pass is ok if you can keep away from his guns.
     
  9. Lou

    Lou It's just toy boats -->> C T D <<-- Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Posts:
    2,092
    Location:
    Smyrna, Georgia
    Bob,

    It was reported that super reverse was not an issue this year. Anything else pop up in its place?
     
  10. Gettysburg114th

    Gettysburg114th Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Posts:
    1,682
    Hey Bob,
    Any word on where Nats might be next year?
    Thanks,
     
  11. Bob

    Bob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Posts:
    1,318
    Super reverse is always a problem and will be until it gets addressed. It was not as noticable this year becease of the types of ships on the water. There were a lot of cruisers. The allies only had 3 hug n slug ships, we did not try to go stern to stern with the axis as they would have crushed our 3 ships with their VDTs & Fuso. If was a fast pond, lots of running in forward.

    NATS 2009 maybe in CO or MO.
     
  12. Jacky Fisher

    Jacky Fisher Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Posts:
    43
    Hey David, Great Nats, but I disagree about super-reverse. Of course it wasn't an issue for cruisers. As a QE captain fighting stern-to-stern, I was at a huge dissadvantage in fleet battles and in one-on-ones. It is still a big issue for those battling without a system.