MWU:OFFENSE-101 'The Geek Breech Cannon'

Discussion in 'Weapons & Pneumatics' started by Tugboat, Jan 29, 2011.

  1. SnipeHunter

    SnipeHunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Posts:
    1,364
    I'm a big fan of using a chrono to find gun velocities, but only on the bench not at the lake, atleast not universally. The amount of time it would eat to chrono every gun on every ship before every sortie (how else could you verify that nobody tweaked between sorties) would be way to much for any decently sized event which is probably where it matters most.

    Can our guns hurt people? sure, deal with it. It is a game based around shooting guns in close proximity to ourselves afterall. And realistically the current "super mega guns of unholy death and destruction" are already pretty close to the realistic max velocity and are already well into the realm of diminishing returns.

    If you're really serious about limiting gun velocity there are a number of good ways that require a lot less time and equipment to enforce. Lower the allowed max pressure, lower max barrel length, or set a limit on the size of the feed line to the gun. (pressure, barrel length, flow volume)

    Gun velocity (like pump rate) is often more about intimidation than actual usefullness. (oh your boat can pump 4 gal/min? sounds good leave it on till it sinks and let me put a few thousand points of belows into you, great idea well as long as you're on the other team)
     
  2. DarrenScott

    DarrenScott -->> C T D <<--

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Posts:
    1,077
    Location:
    Australia
    I see your point, and agree. Testing every barrel on every ship before every battle is unrealistic.

    Testing one or two barrels, on different ships, at random, isn't.

    Applying peer pressure by letting all present know the results of the testing good or bad is a way of allowing each member to self-regulate and decide if they really want to risk being the one caught with way over-velocity cannon..... which is something they can check if they have their own chrony.

    Allowing testing by challenge is a less diplomatic way of doing the job, and may create bad blood, so I'm not really a fan of that. Sometimes, however, there are thick-skinned individuals who just won't take the hint. No, don't think of their name right now, even if you do have one in your club.:whistling:

    Ultimately, it's up to your club and it's members to decide how you limit muzzle velocity, and to each individual member to abide by the club's decision.

    As for barrels, what's wrong with scale length barrels? I've seen photos of some REALLY long barrels on some ships, and thought "nice ship...WHOA! o_Othose guns are UGLY!!!"
    I'll ask at this point that we not hijack this thread too much more, and apologise for doing so.
     
  3. Kun2112

    Kun2112 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Posts:
    710
    One or two questions Herr Professor:
    Is the silicone tubing absolutely necessary. I am not sure I understand the purpose other than elevation control.
    Is there any reason a 1/4" ball bearing cannot be use rather than a 7/32" one? I have, and can use, several thousand 1/4" but cannot find locally any 7/32"
     
  4. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    The silicon hose is essential to the function of the gun. It is NOT there to allow flexing the barrel; it is there to act as a restrictor to the BB, holding it up for a fraction of a second, allowing gas pressure to build up behind the BB until it pops through the restriction and flies downrange at a much higher velocity than it would without that pause. In a Foster breech cannon, this function is served by the O-ring that you tweak. Big Gun cannons do not have the restriction, and so use a much higher gas flow to get the projectiles up to speed.

    To answer the second question, there is nothing preventing the use of a 1/4" bearing; just use a drill bit slightly larger than the bearing's diameter, like 9/32" or so. I do recommend using stainless bearings, if only so you don't have to worry about rust in your breech.
     
  5. Kun2112

    Kun2112 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Posts:
    710
    Now I know-and knowing is half the battle! :D
     
  6. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    Geeeeee- IIIIIIIIII-JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOE!
     
  7. Panzer

    Panzer Iron Dog Shipwerks and CiderHaus

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2013
    Posts:
    628
    Location:
    Hell, MI
    I Know this thread is old but,TugBoat Plz Finish it kind sir!
     
  8. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    I was not happy with how the guns turned out, durability-wise. I need to find good clamps that are small enough to be useful in holding the silicon tubing on the metal tubing.
     
  9. radollar2000

    radollar2000 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Posts:
    167
    Location:
    California
    I have a PDF file that Pete D. put together concerning geek breach cannons. It used brass tubing as a clamping material. It looks t be a bit more complex, but not unreasonably so. I don't remember where I got it from but I can send you a copy. I don't think he'll mind. If he does he can just make you walk to Nats or something. :)
     
  10. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    Please send it :) He won't make me walk, he can't afford the gas for the Deathmobile by himself :) I can make it to Houston in my hybrid on 3 tanks of regular gas :) with a bit left over. Why have I been running a small cruiser? Fits in the car :)
     
  11. Beaver

    Beaver 2020 Rookie of the Year Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2013
    Posts:
    3,702
    Location:
    Central PA
    Could you send me a copy too, I'd love to look at it? Plus there's nobody that can make me walk. lol
    Thanks,
    Beaver
     
  12. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    Let me check with Pete. He's funny about such things getting out. Rest assured that if I can get the geek breech to where I'm happy with it, I'll post details.
     
  13. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,409
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
  14. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    Yeah, that looks like it. I didn't know he published it for open consumption. he can be very secretive about stuff sometimes.
     
  15. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,409
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    I'm not sure how intentionally published it is. Google found it quick (searched for 'geek breech cannons'), but I don't see a link on the MWC articles page at a glance.
     
  16. NickMyers

    NickMyers Admin RCWC Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Posts:
    4,409
    Location:
    Federal Way, WA
    Ah, from the Iron duck thread 4 years ago, that file was supposed to have been pulled...



    Maybe someone could revise it and link it back up with proper notation?
     
  17. U.S.S. Arazona

    U.S.S. Arazona Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Posts:
    191
    Hey tugboat, other than the clamp issue, were there any other major issues with this design? I'd like to use them for my Bismarck:)
     
  18. irnuke

    irnuke -->> C T D <<--

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Posts:
    1,079
    Location:
    York, SC
    I experimented w/ the geek-breech cannons when I first joined the hobby. Here is my (personal) opinions:
    Advantages over compression nut "aka Foster or BC" guns:
    No tweaking needed. => less maintenance or fiddling lakeside
    Disadvantages:
    No tweaking possible. If weather is too warm, gun will shoot "soft". If too cold, the gun will jam
    If the gun jams, full disassembly is required to clear
    Much more complex to build correctly than a Foster. If not done correctly, disassemble and start over.

    Overall, I think Tuggy has a point about these guns being good to put on a loaner boat, as they're lower maintenance if built right. But IMO, the many disadvantages outweigh the few advantages.
    A Foster-breech gun can be built in the same or less time, and gives much more flexibility of performance.
     
  19. U.S.S. Arazona

    U.S.S. Arazona Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Posts:
    191
    And with that, I've decided to go with a foster breech:) Thanks for the help.
     
  20. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    Foster breech is simple and easy enough to make. The way that I was doing the geek breech, it was easier to make, but the clamping issue was not resolved, so that limits how useful it'd be ;)

    What I'm using now is a Foster breech with very thick-walled brass tubing for the barrels (like 1/16" wall thickness). You turn a groove in the breech end, and solder a ring of wire into the groove, which is what the compression nut pulls on to tweak the gun. Very hard to dent a barrel that thick. It also looks like a scale cannon barrel :) Brian makes the barrels and Tees for me, but I use a bypass line to the back of the breech and he does not.