Rule Question

Discussion in 'IRCWCC' started by pacific, Apr 5, 2019.

  1. pacific

    pacific Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2019
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    I'm planning a DKM Scharnhorst build and since I can't break units into smaller cannons, I'm left with an essentially useless point. I want to build one rotating 1 unit cannon in each of the two bow turrets and a rotating 1.5 unit cannon in the stern turret. I want as many sidemounts as possible. What should I do? Can I just not spend the unit? Thanks.
     
  2. Sethie

    Sethie Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Posts:
    21
    Location:
    ohio
    I'd def use it. You can always add a second pump if u dont want the extra gun.
     
  3. Kevin P.

    Kevin P. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2015
    Posts:
    1,729
    Location:
    Chantilly, VA
    Short answer is yes, you don't have to use all of the allowed units

    Longer answer is that you should reevaluate your boat/armament preference. You should try to make it to the battle in Oakboro in 3 weeks. Saturday the 27th would be the best day to come

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/april-ambush-tickets-55878663587

    There will be a lot of different boats to look at, and you can ask around with active battlers to see what they recommend for a first build. In general, starting with a class 4 (4 or 4.5 units) boat would be a lot better. The size is more manageable, still plenty complex, unlikely to get pounded to the same extent a new Scharnhorst trying to use sidemounts would be. If you want to go axis, something like a Baden, Moltke, Derfflinger (a bit long), Espana, (all from Strike, they may or might not have hulls left), or Andrea Doria, Konig, Von Der Tann from BC would be a lot better
     
  4. modelshipsahoy

    modelshipsahoy Vendor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2018
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Michigan
    I have a Scharnhorst Kit available with motor shaft and prop installed. Includes sub deck; bulge pump; plans; all Turrets; and an assembly manual with templates for all the deck levels.

    $200. Free shipping.
    6150668B-37F2-4BD1-B00D-E02601C945C3.jpeg 8D6F355C-10AC-4D48-88FF-329399E04575.jpeg
     
  5. pacific

    pacific Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2019
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    I already bought a deck and hull kit from Strike. Thanks though.
     
  6. Wmemlo

    Wmemlo Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2014
    Posts:
    81
    Location:
    Longview, tx
    Scharnhorst is a beautiful ship. It was my rookie boat. I got very good at making very dry watertight boxes and patching. Had a rotate in B turret, eventually didn’t bother to keep it rotating. It was my best gun and it rarely got used, except when an NC was alongside prepping me for another watertight box test.
     
  7. pacific

    pacific Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2019
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    I also plan to attend the Oakboro meet, I just don't know if I can make it because I just bought a house and that is my moving weekend. How are Scharnhorsts usually armed in fast gun?
     
  8. Bob

    Bob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Posts:
    1,319
    If you put 3 sidemounts in a scharny you need two pumps. You will take a ton of holes.
    You really only need one rotate in the stern. The two bow sidemounts should be fixed. You can’t rotate more than two guns into a side at one time.
     
  9. pacific

    pacific Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2019
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    So 2 units of sidemounts in the front, 2 rotating in the back, and 1.5 of of pumps? If sidemount combat isn't in scharny's wheelhouse how would you recommend setting it up?
     
  10. Anvil_x

    Anvil_x Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2017
    Posts:
    1,551
    Location:
    Athens, GA
    1 in A turret, 1 in B turret, 1.5 cannon in the rotating C turret, and I guess two pumps if memory serves me correctly.... yeah checked the shiplist and she's a 5.5
    Tom Palmer runs a similar layout on the Alaska (but only 1 pump because it's a 4.5 unit boat), and I have a labor of love sitting in the back of my workshop that'll get the same gun layout.

    From what I have seen, that layout is pretty effective. Tom uses his boat for harassment and targets of opportunity, because AK by the length and the single rudder just can't hang it in a slugfest.

    If you built the scharnhorst as described above by Bob, you'd have a shorter, *actually maneuverable* Alaska with the pump power to slug it out when you need to. That'd be a nice boat to have, dude.
     
  11. pacific

    pacific Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2019
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    That was my thinking. Thanks.
     
  12. Kevin P.

    Kevin P. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2015
    Posts:
    1,729
    Location:
    Chantilly, VA
    Triple sterns, 50rd and 25rd sidemount. Best chance at effectiveness
     
    Anvil_x and bsgkid117 like this.
  13. Anvil_x

    Anvil_x Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2017
    Posts:
    1,551
    Location:
    Athens, GA
    Oh yeah, forgot that Scharnhorst has a usable stern, unlike AK.
     
  14. Kevin P.

    Kevin P. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2015
    Posts:
    1,729
    Location:
    Chantilly, VA
  15. bsgkid117

    bsgkid117 Vendor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2013
    Posts:
    1,185
    Location:
    NJ
    Itd be like an Axis NC. Id give that loadout a chance.

    I wouldn't mess with rotates. Especially on a first boat.
     
    Anvil_x likes this.
  16. Bob

    Bob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Posts:
    1,319
    The Scharny is not an Axis NC. Many have tried many have failed. Most of those tried with one bow side mount. Can Scharny really have a 25unit sidemount? I was a rules expert but don’t care enough to be one anymore.
    I guess if you had a super pump you could try a 1/2 unit pump. Some guys are doing this with smaller ships.
    If I’d make a Scharny it would be two 50s up front and a 75 in back.
     
  17. Anvil_x

    Anvil_x Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2017
    Posts:
    1,551
    Location:
    Athens, GA
    This is me just picking your brain and such, Bob.

    the combo you mentioned would carry two pumps.

    with 5.5 units, would it also be viable to try two 50s up front, and two 50s off the stern, and run with 1.5 units in pumps?

    25 round sidemounts are allowed under the ruleset, though I'd be curious to know someone's logic as to why they would prefer a 25 in such an arrangement.

    Keep talking. all of you. your points are interesting.
     
  18. pacific

    pacific Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2019
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    So from what is being said I’m thinking two 50 sidemounts in the bow turrets and linked 50s in the stern and 1.5 pumps. Or 1 50 side mount, 3 50s in the stern, and 1.5 pumps. I think I would rather have the extra pump.
     
  19. Anvil_x

    Anvil_x Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2017
    Posts:
    1,551
    Location:
    Athens, GA
    Cool beans dude, I'm really looking forward to your build thread.

    even if you don't end up going with two pumps initially, I would advise building such that it can be retrofitted to carry two.
    I built my Texas to *only* have room enough for one pump and it is now coming back to haunt me. She's been quite a learning experience in how to build for versatility. My current build's goal is to make as versatile a hull as possible, which means a lot of thinking about how I'd retrofit in future.

    I purchased an Alaska last year from a fella out Minneapolis way, and once I got hands on and tools in, I realized that he had built her 100% from the start to be only a certain configuration. Bomb-proof, but only a stern gunner. I've set her aside, since any work in that boat would require skills I currently do not have, but will gain in the next year or so.

    Maybe after trying a set arrangement of cannon, you'll decide you want a different arrangement. Do make sure that present-you lends a helping hand to future-you in that regard.
     
  20. pacific

    pacific Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2019
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    For sure. I'm just waiting for my research book, plans, and hull to arrive. I was planning on building her modular anyway because I want to do IRC as well as treaty with the same ship.