Shiplist First section

Discussion in '1/96 Battlestations' started by Anachronus, May 1, 2007.

  1. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    Added the Imperial Japanese Navy. Again, please correct me on any oversights or errors.

    J.
     
  2. Tugboat

    Tugboat Facilitator RCWC Staff Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Posts:
    8,298
    Location:
    Statesboro, GA
    I will scan it tomorrow :) Thanks for doing it!
     
  3. Mark

    Mark Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Posts:
    457
    Location:
    Swansea, MA
    what do you use for reference material for the info on the ships?
     
  4. dietzer

    dietzer Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    739
    Thanks for adding the IJN!

    I did notice that the rebuilds of Kitakami and Oi (Kuma Class light cruisers) were missing. This would be nice to have since they had 8 quintuple TT mounts. [:D]

    Thanks,

    Carl
     
  5. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS

    Conway's.
     
  6. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    I can stick them in. I was unsure as how to include them as the whole class was not thusly refitted. I think I will make them a class by themselves.
     
  7. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    Revised IJN now posted.
     
  8. Mark

    Mark Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Posts:
    457
    Location:
    Swansea, MA
    to be honest, I've never even seen "Conway's" and been using Anatomy of the Battleship Yamato, put out by the naval institute press. thats why your numbers didn't match mine, oh well its a start.
     
  9. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS

    I used the Conway's series just to have a uniform base line. I am aware that different sources give different stats for different ships. The anatomy of the ship series books are what I would to consider the more definitive source, but they are not "canon" according to the rules set. If your Yamato conforms more closely to the Anatomy series then it is fine with me. I don't think that the differences are worth arguing over.
     
  10. dietzer

    dietzer Admiral (Supporter)

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    739
    Thanks for the update!

    Carl
     
  11. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    Added the French...now we can all talk like Maurice Chevalier!