Trivia!

Discussion in 'Full Scale' started by Gascan, Nov 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. crzyhawk

    crzyhawk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    Since boomer hasn't asked his question, I will go again.

    Which IJN light cruiser was laid down in WW1, and sank a US Heavy cruiser in WW2? Bonus points for the name of the USN cruiser.
     
  2. BoomerBoy17

    BoomerBoy17 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,946
    sorry guys, i forgot all about this thread.
    And the answer is the Tenryu which sank the USS Quincy CA-35.
    And if its right, u guys can ask more questions as im leaving on vacation shortly.
     
  3. crzyhawk

    crzyhawk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    That's the correct answer. Since I've asked two in a row, and boomer is out, I guess next one in with a question gets to ask it!
     
  4. Knight4hire

    Knight4hire Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Posts:
    963
    This should be an easy one:

    What ship is the only ship US warship to have a bathtub?
     
  5. Knight4hire

    Knight4hire Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Posts:
    963
    Extra points if you and state why.
     
  6. krijn

    krijn Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Posts:
    77
    USS Iowa

    Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a passenger, because of his polio it was more convenient to have a bath installed.


    Krijn

    (wikipedia)
     
  7. krijn

    krijn Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Posts:
    77
    When USS Iowa (BB-61) was selected to ferry President Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Cairo Conference and the Tehran Conference she was outfitted with a bathtub for Roosevelt's convenience. Roosevelt, who had been crippled in 1921, would have been unable to make effective use of a shower facility. This bathtub remains the only one ever installed on a United States Navy warship.


    Wikipedia

    Krijn
     
  8. Knight4hire

    Knight4hire Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Posts:
    963
    You've hit it on the Head Krijn:

    You're up!
    Fire away with the next question.
     
  9. krijn

    krijn Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Posts:
    77
    wich 3 capital sisterships also carried bathtubs wich where heated by excess steam from the boilers.


    crewmembers where free to take a bath but had to pay to use a FRESHLY pressed towel, officers had to share the tub with other crew , something that would never happen in the royal navy


    Krijn
     
  10. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    I have no clue but that is a great one.
     
  11. crzyhawk

    crzyhawk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    That's a good question. I'm going to guess Lutzow - Derfflinger - Hindenburg
     
  12. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    Just to be quirky:

    Espana
    Jamie I
    Alfonso XIII

    It just seems like something a decadent decaying empire would do.
     
  13. crzyhawk

    crzyhawk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    I like your answer better then mine. Mine was a WAG of 3 capital ships in the same class!
     
  14. Kotori87

    Kotori87 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Posts:
    3,535
    Yamato, Musashi, and Shinano. The Japanese love their baths.
     
  15. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    I used the WAG methodology myself. I was torn between the Spanish, the Russians or the French. All had 3 member classes of capital ships.
     
  16. krijn

    krijn Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Posts:
    77
    correct Kotori

    while not verry public knowledge these japanese battleships had not 1 bath but yamato and her sisters had 20 each, they where 30 foot long and filled with seawater.
    Bathers washed themselves before sinking into the tubs assigned to their divisions, there where even bathmasters to maintain and keep an eye on the entire system and the crew.
    bathmasters charged a few sen for a bucket of fresh,clean water and a clean towel, something needed as the bathing left the bathers sticky from the salt.


    a good book on the Yamato is the book "a Glorious way to die: the kamikaze mission of the battleship yamato" by russell spurr (isbn 0-7394-3221-4)

    Krijn
     
  17. crzyhawk

    crzyhawk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    Bleh, I didnt consider Shinano to be a sister of Yamato and Musashi since she was converted to a carrier.
     
  18. crackerzach

    crackerzach Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Posts:
    42
    same hull so same class.
     
  19. Anachronus

    Anachronus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Posts:
    3,085
    Location:
    Natchez, MS
    I would have to agree. IIRC Shinano as a BB would have had some changes in her armor scheme but was far closer to Y and M than Furious was to Courageous and Glorious.
     
  20. krijn

    krijn Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Posts:
    77
    well i didnt want to make an exeption as Shinano was suposed to be the 3rd yamato class SD

    but the bath thing is amazing, gives a clue how huge this ship actually was that they can have a series of bath's aboard.

    as people dont see scale well i bought a 1/144 scale sherman and a lcm .. people remember how big a tank is .. now put the tank in the lcm and that aside a destroyer or battleship and suddenly they start realizing just how big a 10000 tonnes northampton or a 880 ft long Iowa .it gives people an impression of scale.

    Krijn
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.