Your thoughts on never built/completed ships?

Discussion in 'General' started by PreDread, Apr 25, 2008.

  1. Chris Easterbrook

    Chris Easterbrook Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Posts:
    1,333
    From everything I have read H-39 would have had only 8 16 inch guns not 12 15 inch.
     
  2. warspiteIRC

    warspiteIRC RIP

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Posts:
    756
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    Hey, ya' left out the Montana!!!
     
  3. crzyhawk

    crzyhawk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    His rules only cover WW1 era ships to like 1922 or something like that, so only the South Dakota class Montana would be available.
     
  4. FirePowerDan

    FirePowerDan RIP

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Posts:
    320
    Yes. That is why I posed that question. That Company Alnavco made a model of this. I wanted their info where they got this idea from. They probably just did it because they thought it was neat.
     
  5. CURT

    CURT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Posts:
    5,751
    Location:
    St. John's Newfoundland , Canada
    I don't have an issue with them as long as the they can be incorporated into the rule system .
     
  6. Jonhanze01

    Jonhanze01 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Posts:
    33
    As far as i'm concerned so long as the person building them can build them to the standard rules of the organization he/she is affiliated with and if it makes the person happy, why not, variety is the spice of life. Personally I would like to see a ship like that competing. It would be something different and have possibly a whole new set of challenges as far as the captain fighting with it and for the captains fighting against it.